Countries where authors publish in Sen i Gakkaishi
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sen i Gakkaishi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sen i Gakkaishi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sen i Gakkaishi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sen i Gakkaishi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sen i Gakkaishi.
About Sen i Gakkaishi
The 3.6k papers published in Sen i Gakkaishi in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Sen i Gakkaishi usually cover Polymers and Plastics (1.2k papers), Biomaterials (684 papers), Building and Construction (585 papers), General Materials Science (57 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (391 papers) specifically the topics of Textile materials and evaluations (655 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (569 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (272 papers), Material Properties and Processing (268 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (260 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (221 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (197 papers) and Silk-based biomaterials and applications (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sen i Gakkaishi are Jiro Shimizu, Akira Isogai, Takeshi Kikutani, Toshisada Takahashi, Kiyoshi Hirabayashi, Norimasa Okui, Teruo Hori, Tomiji Wakida, Hiromichi Kawai and Makoto Usuda.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.