Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih

429 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 429 papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (124 papers), Reproductive Medicine (82 papers) and Epidemiology (58 papers) specifically the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (47 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (46 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih are You‐Lin Qiao, Huixia Yang, Hongxia Li, Min Liu, Xiaojuan Wang, Huijuan Liu, Fengxia Xue, Liping Zhu, Sun Xiao and Lin Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih.

Countries where authors publish in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung-Hua Fu Ch'an K'o Tsa Chih more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025