Fengxia Xue

5.4k citations
124 papers · 3.9k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Fengxia Xue

117 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Fengxia Xue
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 496
  • Microbiology 343
  • Cancer Research 732
  • Oncology 938
  • Reproductive Medicine 281
Replace Sepp Leodolter with:
Sepp Leodolter Austria
David Cantú de León Mexico
Jan Kotarski Poland
Ilona Kovalszky Hungary
Noriaki Sakuragi Japan
Hisashi Narahara Japan
Christoph Grimm Austria
Isao Miyakawa Japan
Pei Hui United States
Michael Stöckle Germany
Fengxia Xue relative to Sepp Leodolter Austria Sepp Leodolter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Sepp Leodolter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fengxia Xue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fengxia Xue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fengxia Xue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fengxia Xue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fengxia Xue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fengxia Xue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fengxia Xue. The network helps show where Fengxia Xue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fengxia Xue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fengxia Xue Line = papers co-authored together Fengxia Xue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015366
2 2017156
3 2009153
4 2010152
5 2016145
6 2012132
7 2009130
8 2014117
9 2014106
10 2015103
11 201282
12 201978
13 201078
14 201375
15 202070
16 201165
17 201464
18 202363
19 201663
20 202158

About Fengxia Xue

Fengxia Xue is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research, Microbiology and Immunology, having authored 124 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (17 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (11 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (10 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (9 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (9 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (496 citations), Microbiology (343 citations), Cancer Research (732 citations), Oncology (938 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (281 citations). Fengxia Xue has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yingmei Wang, Wenyan Tian, Cha Han, Huiying Zhang, Aiping Fan, Chao Gao, Y Wang, Jinsong Liu, Fangyu Guo and W Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, Cancer Biology & Therapy, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact