Chinese Herbal Medicines

771 papers and 6.8k indexed citations

About

The 771 papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines usually cover Molecular Biology (402 papers), Plant Science (201 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (193 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (148 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (121 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Herbal Medicines are Changxiao Liu, Pei‐Gen Xiao, Da‐Cheng Hao, Chun Hu, De‐an Guo, Changxiao Liu, Shilin Chen, Xiaojie Gu, Jianping Han and Xiaojiaoyang Li.

In The Last Decade

Chinese Herbal Medicines

747 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Herbal Medicines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Herbal Medicines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Herbal Medicines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026