Chinese Political Science Review

259 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Chinese Political Science Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Political Science Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (181 papers), Sociology and Political Science (136 papers) and Development (58 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (58 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (54 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Political Science Review are Philippe C. Schmitter, Xiaojun Li, Abdur Rehman Shah, Paris Aslanidis, Hai Yang, Kevin G. Cai, Dali L. Yang, Kenneth M. Roberts, Yijun Shen and Charles Lees.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Political Science Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Political Science Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Political Science Review.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Political Science Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Political Science Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Political Science Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Political Science Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025