Virtual Archaeology Review

384 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 384 papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review usually cover Geology (280 papers), Archeology (148 papers) and Conservation (97 papers) specifically the topics of 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (280 papers), Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (86 papers) and Archaeological and Historical Studies (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Virtual Archaeology Review are Fabrizio Banfi, Raffaella Brumana, C. Stanga, Juan Enrique Nieto Julián, Maurizio Forte, Erik Champion, Hafizur Rahaman, M. Previtali, Juan Moyano and Fabio Remondino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Virtual Archaeology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Virtual Archaeology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Virtual Archaeology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virtual Archaeology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025