Contemporary Women s Writing

258 papers and 515 indexed citations i.

About

The 258 papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing in the last decades have received a total of 515 indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (142 papers), Sociology and Political Science (62 papers) and Cultural Studies (42 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (44 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (34 papers) and Short Stories in Global Literature (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Women s Writing are Kaiama L. Glover, Steve Leonard, Claire Chambers, Terry Young, Sarah Brophy, Judith Kegan Gardiner, Margaret Homans, Kate Douglas, Yasmin Ara Begum and Liedeke Plate.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Women s Writing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Women s Writing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Women s Writing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Women s Writing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025