Countries where authors publish in Cell Regeneration
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cell Regeneration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cell Regeneration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cell Regeneration more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cell Regeneration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cell Regeneration.
About Cell Regeneration
The 250 papers published in Cell Regeneration in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Cell Regeneration usually cover Aging (5 papers), Molecular Biology (164 papers), Genetics (21 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (7 papers) and Cell Biology (29 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (49 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (27 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (23 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (21 papers), Congenital heart defects research (20 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (17 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (16 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cell Regeneration are Hans R. Schöler, Guangming Wu, Behnam Ebrahimi, Günes Özhan, Gilbert Weidinger, Ye‐Guang Chen, Heinz Redl, Ke Wei, Carolin Steffenhagen and Eleni Oberbauer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.