Pediatric Exercise Science

1.3k papers and 33.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science in the last decades have received a total of 33.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (483 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (462 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (444 papers) specifically the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (440 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (436 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (392 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pediatric Exercise Science are James F. Sallis, Jennifer L. Etnier, Benjamin A. Sibley, Maureen R. Weiss, Alex V. Rowlands, Russell R. Pate, Neil Armstrong, Peter R.E. Crocker, Kent C. Kowalski and Roy J. Shephard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science.

Countries where authors publish in Pediatric Exercise Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pediatric Exercise Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pediatric Exercise Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pediatric Exercise Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025