Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences

222 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 222 papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences usually cover Applied Mathematics (122 papers), Mathematical Physics (91 papers) and Geometry and Topology (75 papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (50 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (46 papers) and Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences are Filippo Santambrogio, Günther Uhlmann, Giuseppe Mingione, Tuomo Kuusi, Maciej Zworski, Victor Ivrii, Gene Abrams, Nicola Fusco, Vladimir Peller and Neil S. Trudinger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025