Brain Tumor Pathology

687 papers and 10.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 687 papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology usually cover Genetics (400 papers), Neurology (217 papers) and Molecular Biology (206 papers) specifically the topics of Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (397 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (122 papers) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Tumor Pathology are Koichi Ichimura, Yoshihiko Yoshii, Yukinari Kato, Hiroshi Nishioka, Shingo Takano, Naoko Inoshita, Isao Date, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Tomotsugu Ichikawa and Yoichi Nakazato.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Tumor Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Tumor Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Tumor Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Tumor Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025