Brain Research Protocols

482 papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 482 papers published in Brain Research Protocols in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Research Protocols usually cover Molecular Biology (227 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (221 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (66 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (139 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (37 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Research Protocols are Anders Ågmo, Pentti Tuohimaa, Allan V. Kalueff, Barbara Vollmayr, Daryl R. Kipke, Robert L. Rennaker, Justin C. Williams, Francisco Barceló, Bjarne Winther Kristensen and Jens Zimmer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Research Protocols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Research Protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Research Protocols.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Research Protocols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Research Protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Research Protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Research Protocols more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025