This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Boreas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Boreas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boreas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Boreas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Boreas.
About Boreas
The 2.4k papers published in Boreas in the last decades have received a total of 76.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Boreas usually cover Atmospheric Science (2.2k papers), Earth-Surface Processes (689 papers), Paleontology (384 papers), Anthropology (470 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (346 papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2.1k papers), Geological formations and processes (642 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (478 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (469 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (341 papers), Climate change and permafrost (306 papers), Marine and environmental studies (244 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (234 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Boreas are Jan Mangerud, Christian Hjort, Jakob Wallinga, Johannes Krüger, Björn Berglund, Michael Houmark‐Nielsen, Jürgen Böhner, G.A.T. Duller, Ole Bennike and John A. Matthews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.