Chloe E. H. Scott
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Deborah J. MacDonald (39 shared papers)C. R. Howie (14 shared papers)Leela Biant (6 shared papers)Nick D. Clement (31 shared papers)Matthew Moran (13 shared papers)Kate E. Bugler (1 shared paper)R.W. Nutton (6 shared papers)Liam Z. Yapp (20 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Bone & Joint Journal (35 papers)Bone & Joint Open (18 papers)The Journal of Arthroplasty (6 papers)Bone and Joint Research (6 papers)The Knee (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaRussia
In The Last Decade
Chloe E. H. Scott
97 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Chloe E. H. Scott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Surgery 2.5k
- Oncology 200
- Rheumatology 109
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 111
- Health Informatics 8
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe E. H. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe E. H. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe E. H. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe E. H. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe E. H. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe E. H. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe E. H. Scott. The network helps show where Chloe E. H. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloe E. H. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 716 |
| 2 | Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 309 |
| 3 | 2019 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 123 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 114 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 101 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 99 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 92 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 84 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 83 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 64 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 37 |
About Chloe E. H. Scott
Chloe E. H. Scott is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (69 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (28 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (10 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (6 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (6 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (2.5k citations), Oncology (200 citations), Rheumatology (109 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (111 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Chloe E. H. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Deborah J. MacDonald, C. R. Howie, Leela Biant, Nick D. Clement, Matthew Moran, Kate E. Bugler, R.W. Nutton, Liam Z. Yapp, S. J. Breusch and F. A. Wade. Their work appears in journals such as The Bone & Joint Journal, Bone & Joint Open, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Bone and Joint Research and The Knee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.