Countries where authors publish in ULTRASONOGRAPHY
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ULTRASONOGRAPHY more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY.
About ULTRASONOGRAPHY
The 657 papers published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in ULTRASONOGRAPHY usually cover Hepatology (57 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (93 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 papers), Surgery (161 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (56 papers) specifically the topics of Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (88 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (55 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (50 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (41 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (39 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (29 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (23 papers) and Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ULTRASONOGRAPHY are Min Woo Lee, Eun‐Kyung Kim, Nariya Cho, Gilles Russ, Jung Hwan Baek, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Young H. Kim, Ji Hyun Youk, Jeong Ah Ryu and Eun Ju Son.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.