ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

8.3k citations
339 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

320 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Management Information Systems 1.4k
  • Information Systems 2.8k
  • Information Systems and Management 648
  • Health Informatics 117
  • Artificial Intelligence 2.7k
Replace Journal of Database Management with:
Journal of Database Management United States
Big Data United States
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights India
Applied Computing and Informatics India
Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline United States
International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems China
Big Data Research China
Computer Science Review India
Journal of Data and Information Quality United States
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems United States
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems relative to Journal of Database Management United States Journal of Database Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Journal of Database Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems.

About ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

The 339 papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems usually cover Management Information Systems (55 papers), Information Systems (123 papers), Artificial Intelligence (124 papers), Communication (25 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (42 papers) specifically the topics of Big Data and Business Intelligence (27 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (23 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (21 papers), Topic Modeling (21 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (21 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (20 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (20 papers) and Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems are Neil T. Hunt, Carlos Alberto Gomez-Uribe, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Jason Bennett Thatcher, Paul Clay, Michelle Carter, D. Harrison McKnight, Sudha Ram, Hsinchun Chen and Ee‐Peng Lim.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact