Behaviour Change

788 papers and 10.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 788 papers published in Behaviour Change in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Behaviour Change usually cover Clinical Psychology (512 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (154 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (272 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (192 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behaviour Change are Paula M. Barrett, Matthew R. Sanders, Mark R. Dadds, Maree J. Abbott, Eleonora Gullone, David J. Leach, Robert A. Neimeyer, Jay S. Birnbrauer, Susan H. Spence and Neville J. King.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behaviour Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behaviour Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behaviour Change.

Countries where authors publish in Behaviour Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behaviour Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behaviour Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behaviour Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025