Australian Feminist Studies

937 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 937 papers published in Australian Feminist Studies in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Feminist Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (396 papers), Gender Studies (309 papers) and History (83 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (158 papers), Australian History and Society (104 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Feminist Studies are Aileen Moreton‐Robinson, Ángela McRobbie, Donna Haraway, Elizabeth Grosz, Margaret Thornton, Virginia Braun, Barbara Baird, Shani Orgad, Rosi Braidotti and Rosalind Gill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Feminist Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Feminist Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Feminist Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Feminist Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Feminist Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Feminist Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Feminist Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025