Techniques in Orthopaedics

8.0k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Surgery top 10%
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
    • Hip disorders and treatments

Papers in

  • Surgery 1.2k
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 294
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 292
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 271
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 183
    • Hip and Femur Fractures 172
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 167
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 152

Techniques in Orthopaedics

1.2k papers receiving 7.2k citations

Peers

Techniques in Orthopaedics
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.3k
  • Surgery 5.8k
  • Rehabilitation 564
  • Epidemiology 2.1k
  • Internal Medicine 130
Replace HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery with:
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
The Keio Journal of Medicine Japan
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery South Korea
JBJS Reviews United States
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Brazil
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira Brazil
Journal of Investigative Surgery United States
Singapore Medical Journal Singapore
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine South Korea
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research United States
Techniques in Orthopaedics relative to HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Techniques in Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Techniques in Orthopaedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Techniques in Orthopaedics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics.

About Techniques in Orthopaedics

The 1.3k papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (231 papers), Surgery (1.2k papers), Rehabilitation (163 papers), Epidemiology (430 papers) and Health Informatics (7 papers) specifically the topics of Bone fractures and treatments (329 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (294 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (292 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (271 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (183 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (172 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (167 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Techniques in Orthopaedics are Lawrence D. Dorr, Thomas Sampson, Richard B. Caspari, Dror Paley, Scott A. Rodeo, Russell F. Warren, J. Norgrove Penny, Stuart A. Green, Richard A. Gosselin and Clifford W. Colwell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact