Countries where authors publish in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN.
About ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
The 1.3k papers published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN in the last decades have received a total of 31.6k indexed citations . Papers published in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN usually cover Atmospheric Science (905 papers), Oceanography (472 papers), Global and Planetary Change (778 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (83 papers) and Environmental Engineering (86 papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (546 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (396 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (356 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (236 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (183 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (150 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (136 papers) and Climate change and permafrost (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN are N. A. McFarlane, Lucie A. Vincent, Éva Mekis, William D. Hogg, Diana L. Verseghy, André Robert, Xuebin Zhang, Mark C. Serreze, John R. N. Lazier and Ross Duncan Brown.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.