JBJS Reviews

12.9k citations
984 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

Papers in

    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 160
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 145
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 121
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 97
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 78
    • Hip disorders and treatments 67
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 61

JBJS Reviews

859 papers receiving 11.8k citations

Peers

JBJS Reviews
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.6k
  • Surgery 7.9k
  • Rehabilitation 732
  • Rheumatology 808
  • Health Informatics 68
Replace HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery with:
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Italy
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery South Korea
EFORT Open Reviews United Kingdom
Journal of Ultrasound Italy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America United States
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Italy
Bone and Joint Research United Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Finland
Orthopedic Reviews United States
JBJS Reviews relative to HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in JBJS Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JBJS Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JBJS Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JBJS Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers published in JBJS Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JBJS Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JBJS Reviews.

About JBJS Reviews

The 984 papers published in JBJS Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Papers published in JBJS Reviews usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (130 papers), Surgery (651 papers), Rehabilitation (63 papers), Rheumatology (70 papers) and Epidemiology (139 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (160 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (145 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (121 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (97 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (78 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (74 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (67 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JBJS Reviews are Stefan Rammelt, Jan Bartoníček, Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous, Lyndsay E. Somerville, Jacquelyn D. Marsh, Kevin John Bozic, S. Robert Rozbruch, Brent A. Lanting, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom and Mary K. Mulcahey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact