JBJS Reviews

12.0k citations
970 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

Papers in

    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 158
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 143
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 119
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 95
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 78
    • Hip disorders and treatments 67
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 60

JBJS Reviews

833 papers receiving 11.1k citations

Peers

JBJS Reviews
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.5k
  • Surgery 7.3k
  • Rehabilitation 672
  • Rheumatology 749
  • Health Informatics 57
Replace HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery with:
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Italy
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery South Korea
EFORT Open Reviews United Kingdom
The Surgeon United Kingdom
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America United States
Journal of Ultrasound Italy
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Italy
Orthopedic Reviews United States
Bone and Joint Research United Kingdom
JBJS Reviews relative to HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in JBJS Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JBJS Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JBJS Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JBJS Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers published in JBJS Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JBJS Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JBJS Reviews.

About JBJS Reviews

The 970 papers published in JBJS Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 12.0k indexed citations . Papers published in JBJS Reviews usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (127 papers), Surgery (640 papers), Rehabilitation (62 papers), Rheumatology (68 papers) and Health Informatics (6 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (158 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (143 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (119 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (95 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (78 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (73 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (67 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JBJS Reviews are Stefan Rammelt, Jan Bartoníček, Lyndsay Somerville, Jacquelyn Marsh, Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous, Kevin J. Bozic, S. Robert Rozbruch, Brent A. Lanting, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom and Andrew S. Chung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact