Orthopedic Reviews

649 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 649 papers published in Orthopedic Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Orthopedic Reviews usually cover Surgery (503 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (126 papers) and Epidemiology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (127 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (127 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Orthopedic Reviews are Wayne G. Paprosky, Xinning Li, Markus Jäger, Randeep Aujla, Stephen R Knight, Dennis C. Crawford, Alan D. Kaye, Masood Umer, Shahryar Noordin and Chayanin Angthong.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Orthopedic Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Orthopedic Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Orthopedic Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Orthopedic Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Orthopedic Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Orthopedic Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthopedic Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025