Artificial Intelligence Review

109.4k citations
2.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
    • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
    • Topic Modeling
    • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
    • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Papers in

    • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research 233
    • Topic Modeling 169
    • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications 131
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 128
    • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications 104

Artificial Intelligence Review

2.5k papers receiving 103.6k citations

Peers

Artificial Intelligence Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Artificial Intelligence 45.0k
  • Health Informatics 1.1k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 17.4k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 8.6k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 9.1k
Replace Information Fusion with:
Information Fusion China
Decision Support Systems United States
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing China
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
Knowledge and Information Systems China
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies United States
Computers & Electrical Engineering China
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) United States
IBM Journal of Research and Development United States
Information Processing & Management China
Artificial Intelligence Review relative to Information Fusion China Information Fusion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Information Fusion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Artificial Intelligence Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Artificial Intelligence Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Artificial Intelligence Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review.

About Artificial Intelligence Review

The 2.7k papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review in the last decades have received a total of 109.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Artificial Intelligence Review usually cover Artificial Intelligence (1.4k papers), Health Informatics (36 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (548 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (293 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (327 papers) specifically the topics of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (233 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (172 papers), Topic Modeling (169 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (131 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (130 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (128 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (106 papers) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Artificial Intelligence Review are Lior Rokach, Sotiris Kotsiantis, Jim Austin, Joanna Hodge, Derviş Karaboğa, Michael J. Pazzani, Janet L. Kolodner, Andrew Moore, Shifei Ding and Anupam Agrawal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact