Arkiv för matematik

1.3k papers and 19.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Arkiv för matematik in the last decades have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Arkiv för matematik usually cover Applied Mathematics (705 papers), Mathematical Physics (537 papers) and Geometry and Topology (431 papers) specifically the topics of Holomorphic and Operator Theory (259 papers), Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (216 papers) and Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arkiv för matematik are Gerald B. Folland, Lars Hörmander, Gunnar Aronsson, Svante Janson, Hans Brolin, Peter Whittle, Olof Hanner, Jean Bourgain, Göran Björck and Tom H. Koornwinder.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arkiv för matematik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arkiv för matematik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arkiv för matematik.

Countries where authors publish in Arkiv för matematik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arkiv för matematik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arkiv för matematik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arkiv för matematik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025