Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

12.0k papers and 132.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 12.0k papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 132.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (4.0k papers), Surgery (2.2k papers) and Cancer Research (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of MicroRNA in disease regulation (930 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (823 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (615 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are Demetrios�� Spandidos, Weiwei Pan, Lingling Hu, Yanjun Guo, Zhong‐Fei Shen, Ying Xu, Shengbing Liu, Xin Zhao, Wenjuan Huang and Xia Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025