Anthropological Review

519 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 519 papers published in Anthropological Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropological Review usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (127 papers), Archeology (96 papers) and Genetics (68 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (86 papers), Nutrition and Health Studies (57 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropological Review are Elżbieta Żądzińska, Krzysztof Kościński, Maciej Henneberg, Piotr Paweł Chmielewski, Bogusław Pawłowski, Kaushık Bose, Krzysztof Szostek, Maria Kaczmarek, Charlotte A. Roberts and Anahit Yu. Khudaverdyan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anthropological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025