Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa

505 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 505 papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa usually cover Demography (216 papers), Sociology and Political Science (181 papers) and Communication (122 papers) specifically the topics of Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (210 papers), Media Studies and Communication (102 papers) and Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa are David Robie, Dianne Jones, Chris Nash, Mark Pearson, James Gomez, Glen Finau, Michael E. Meadows, Sharyn Graham Davies, Nic Maclellan and Robert A. Hackett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Journalism Review – Te Koakoa more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025