Aeolian Research

710 papers and 18.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 710 papers published in Aeolian Research in the last decades have received a total of 18.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Aeolian Research usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (601 papers), Atmospheric Science (433 papers) and Soil Science (270 papers) specifically the topics of Aeolian processes and effects (577 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (296 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (266 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aeolian Research are Nick Middleton, Yaping Shao, Daniel R. Muhs, Douglas J. Sherman, Barbara A. Maher, Bailiang Li, Alireza Rashki, Dimitris G. Kaskaoutis, Grant H. McTainsh and Irene Delgado‐Fernández.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Aeolian Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Aeolian Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aeolian Research.

Countries where authors publish in Aeolian Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aeolian Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aeolian Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aeolian Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025