Annual Review of Plant Biology

638 papers and 213.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 638 papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology in the last decades have received a total of 213.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology usually cover Plant Science (481 papers), Molecular Biology (411 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Molecular Biology Research (232 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (158 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Plant Biology are Mark Tester, Rana Munns, Jian‐Kang Zhu, Klaus Apel, Heribert Hirt, Neil R. Baker, Shinjiro Yamaguchi, Elizabeth A. H. Pilon‐Smits, Yunde Zhao and Thomas Boller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Plant Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Plant Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Plant Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Plant Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025