Annales Botanici Fennici

1.1k papers and 9.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (761 papers), Plant Science (698 papers) and Molecular Biology (380 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (304 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (299 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (268 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annales Botanici Fennici are Teuvo Ahtı, Jaakko Jalas, Leena Hämet-Ahti, Harri Vasander, Tuomo Niemelä, Per Milberg, Timo Koponen, Tapio Lindholm, Pekka Pakarinen and Soili Stenroos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici.

Countries where authors publish in Annales Botanici Fennici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annales Botanici Fennici. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annales Botanici Fennici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annales Botanici Fennici more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025