Animal Health Research Reviews

409 papers and 18.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 409 papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews usually cover Infectious Diseases (122 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (118 papers) and Microbiology (96 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (94 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (89 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Animal Health Research Reviews are Carlton Gyles, John M. Fairbrother, Éric Nadeau, Jeffrey J. Zimmerman, Hyun S. Lillehoj, Tanja Opriessnig, Robert W. Fulton, Joaquím Segalés, Mariano Domingo and Gordon Allan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Animal Health Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Animal Health Research Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Animal Health Research Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Health Research Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025