Emily E. Anderson

2.3k citations
89 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Emily E. Anderson

86 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Emily E. Anderson
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Health Informatics 34
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 501
  • General Health Professions 341
  • Pharmacy 51
  • Safety Research 98
Replace Rosamond Rhodes with:
Rosamond Rhodes United States
Michael Dunn United Kingdom
Lisa Schwartz Canada
Paul Schotsmans Belgium
J. S. Blumenthal‐Barby United States
Alastair V. Campbell Singapore
Larry R. Churchill United States
Dario Sambunjak Croatia
Marshall B. Kapp United States
Dick L. Willems Netherlands
Emily E. Anderson relative to Rosamond Rhodes United States Rosamond Rhodes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Rosamond Rhodes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Anderson. The network helps show where Emily E. Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Anderson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Anderson Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Anderson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201288
2 200681
3 200658
4 201351
5 201149
6 201746
7 200645
8 201339
9 202038
10 202038
11 200636
12 201734
13 201834
14 200832
15 201429
16 201529
17 202125
18 201223
19 201923
20 201322

About Emily E. Anderson

Emily E. Anderson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (29 papers), Ethics in medical practice (19 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (34 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (501 citations), General Health Professions (341 citations), Pharmacy (51 citations) and Safety Research (98 citations). Emily E. Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James M. DuBois, Alicia K. Matthews, John T. Chibnall, Amparo Castillo, Matthew K. Wynia, Kavita Shah, Kelly Carroll, Tyler S. Gibb, Heidi A. Walsh and Kent Hoskins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Accountability in Research, Notes, AJOB Empirical Bioethics and Academic Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact