This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Adsorption. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Adsorption with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adsorption more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Adsorption. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Adsorption.
About Adsorption
The 2.1k papers published in Adsorption in the last decades have received a total of 47.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Adsorption usually cover Inorganic Chemistry (506 papers), Water Science and Technology (374 papers), Mechanical Engineering (747 papers), Catalysis (119 papers) and Materials Chemistry (790 papers) specifically the topics of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (492 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (361 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (339 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (329 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (289 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (236 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (202 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (156 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Adsorption are Shivaji Sircar, Yuh‐Shan Ho, Matthias Thommes, Stefano Brandani, Paul A. Webley, Katie A. Cychosz, Teofil Jesionowski, Ralph T. Yang, Nick D. Hutson and Alı́rio E. Rodrigues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.