Acta Biologica Hungarica

996 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 996 papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica usually cover Molecular Biology (330 papers), Plant Science (321 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (185 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (107 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (72 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Biologica Hungarica are T. Kiss, Zoltán Rakonczay, Robert M. Stern, Andreas Wanninger, Ágnes Vehovszky, M. Szilágyi, E. Tyihák, Etsuro Ito, F. W. Schürmann and Dushantha Nalin K. Jayakody.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Biologica Hungarica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Biologica Hungarica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Biologica Hungarica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Biologica Hungarica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025