This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forest Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forest Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Systems more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Forest Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forest Systems.
About Forest Systems
The 1.1k papers published in Forest Systems in the last decades have received a total of 11.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Forest Systems usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (530 papers), Global and Planetary Change (391 papers), Forestry (52 papers), Insect Science (144 papers) and Plant Science (344 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (447 papers), Forest Management and Policy (189 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (124 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (121 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (109 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (98 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (93 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forest Systems are Gustavo Montero, Miren del Rı́o, Isabel Cañellas, Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado, Felipe Bravo, Ricardo Alı́a, Margarida Tomé, Hans Pretzsch, Sergi García‐Barreda and Luis Gil.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.