Countries where authors publish in Financial Management
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Financial Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Financial Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Financial Management more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Financial Management
This network shows the impact of papers published in Financial Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Financial Management.
About Financial Management
The 1.8k papers published in Financial Management in the last decades have received a total of 69.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Financial Management usually cover Accounting (1.1k papers), Finance (814 papers), Strategy and Management (182 papers), Management Information Systems (32 papers) and General Decision Sciences (6 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (874 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (451 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (167 papers), Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance (141 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (123 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (113 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (75 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Financial Management are Kee H. Chung, Murray Z. Frank, Vidhan K. Goyal, Michael S. Weisbach, Stephen W. Pruitt, Benjamin E. Hermalin, J.B. Heaton, Tim Loughran B, Michael C. Jensen and Joshua Y. Lerner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.