West Texas A&M University

38.7k citations
2.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

West Texas A&M University

2.0k papers receiving 34.2k citations

Peers

West Texas A&M University
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 3.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.9k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.7k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 779
  • Information Systems and Management 1.6k
Replace Fort Hays State University with:
Fort Hays State University United States
University of Nebraska at Kearney United States
Prairie View A&M University United States
Dakota State University United States
Tarleton State University United States
Angelo State University United States
Stephen F. Austin State University United States
Austin College United States
Arkansas State University United States
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez Mexico
West Texas A&M University relative to Fort Hays State University United States Fort Hays State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24.3×
Fort Hays State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at West Texas A&M University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at West Texas A&M University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at West Texas A&M University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites West Texas A&M University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at West Texas A&M University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with West Texas A&M University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with West Texas A&M University at the time of their publication.

About West Texas A&M University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with West Texas A&M University have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 38.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 211 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 190 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 42 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 80 papers in Microbiology and 96 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (107 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (84 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (84 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (80 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (65 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (61 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (54 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (54 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (3.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.9k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (2.7k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (779 citations) and Information Systems and Management (1.6k citations). Authors at West Texas A&M University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Food Protection, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Meat Science and Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice. Some of West Texas A&M University's most productive authors include Pradeep Racherla, G.A. Crowder, Andrew Li, B. A. Stewart, Xiaolin Lin, Chong Do Lee, Syed Tariq Anwar, Jonathan A. Shaffer, Guy H. Loneragan and Xuequn Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact