Wayne State College

1.5k papers receiving 36.5k citations

Peers

Wayne State College
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Applied Psychology 1.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.8k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.5k
  • Social Psychology 5.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.3k
Replace Southwest Minnesota State University with:
Southwest Minnesota State University United States
University of Nebraska at Kearney United States
University of Central Missouri United States
St. Catherine University United States
Minnesota Department of Education United States
Concordia University United States
University of Minnesota Morris United States
Individual Differences United States
Truman State University United States
Emporia State University United States
Wayne State College relative to Southwest Minnesota State University United States Southwest Minnesota State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Southwest Minnesota State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wayne State College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wayne State College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wayne State College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne State College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wayne State College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wayne State College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wayne State College at the time of their publication.

About Wayne State College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wayne State College have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 42.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Applied Psychology, 80 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 37 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 107 papers in Clinical Psychology and 69 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology on the topics of Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (61 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (50 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (45 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (37 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (32 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (27 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (26 papers) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.8k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (3.5k citations), Social Psychology (5.1k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.3k citations). Authors at Wayne State College collaborate with scholars in United States, Japan and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, Philosophical Studies and Chemistry - A European Journal. Some of Wayne State College's most productive authors include Jacob S. Kounin, Kalman J. Kaplan, Timothy Bates, Rebecca Treiman, Lynn R. Anderson, Mark S. Goldman, Catherine Kirchmeyer, Carolyn Uhlinger Shantz, Michael W. Marek and Catherine Rudin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact