University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

401 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

University of Arkansas – Fort Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Filtration and Separation 130
  • Management Information Systems 338
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Catalysis 212
  • Parasitology 189
Replace Benedictine University with:
Benedictine University United States
Southwestern Oklahoma State University United States
Kraft Heinz (United States) United States
University School of Milwaukee United States
Dominican University United States
Kansas State Department of Education United States
East Central University United States
University of Tennessee System United States
Christian Brothers University United States
Anderson University - Indiana United States
University of Arkansas – Fort Smith relative to Benedictine University United States Benedictine University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Benedictine University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Arkansas – Fort Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith at the time of their publication.

About University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith have published 510 papers, which have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in Parasitology, 2 papers in Research and Theory, 23 papers in Accounting, 4 papers in Filtration and Separation and 2 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects on the topics of Bird parasitology and diseases (19 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (17 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (11 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (8 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (8 papers) and Vector-borne infectious diseases (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Filtration and Separation (130 citations), Management Information Systems (338 citations), Research and Theory (26 citations), Catalysis (212 citations) and Parasitology (189 citations). Authors at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith collaborate with scholars in United States, Bangladesh and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Journal of Molecular Liquids, Journal of Education for Business and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Some of University of Arkansas – Fort Smith's most productive authors include Emile Letournel, R Judet, Bradley E. Wiggins, Mohammad A. Halim, Md Nayeem Hossain, Muhammad Ali, Roger Price, Md Sajjadur Rahman, Jim R. Wollscheid and Madhav V. Rajan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact