University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

7.1k citations
480 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bird parasitology and diseases 16
    • Accounting Education and Careers 13
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 9

University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

395 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

University of Arkansas – Fort Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Filtration and Separation 128
  • Research and Theory 39
  • Management Information Systems 346
  • Catalysis 198
  • Accounting 312
Replace Southwestern Oklahoma State University with:
Southwestern Oklahoma State University United States
Dominican University United States
Mississippi College United States
Lipscomb University United States
University of Atlanta United States
University of Wisconsin–Superior United States
University of Tennessee System United States
University of St. Thomas - Texas United States
University School of Milwaukee United States
Online Technologies (United States) United States
University of Arkansas – Fort Smith relative to Southwestern Oklahoma State University United States Southwestern Oklahoma State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Southwestern Oklahoma State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Arkansas – Fort Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith at the time of their publication.

About University of Arkansas – Fort Smith

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Arkansas – Fort Smith have published 480 papers, which have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16 papers in Parasitology, 27 papers in Accounting, 2 papers in Research and Theory, 18 papers in Dermatology and 4 papers in Filtration and Separation on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (16 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (16 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (13 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (10 papers), Management and Marketing Education (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Filtration and Separation (128 citations), Research and Theory (39 citations), Management Information Systems (346 citations), Catalysis (198 citations) and Accounting (312 citations). Authors at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith collaborate with scholars in United States, Bangladesh and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Journal of Molecular Liquids and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Some of University of Arkansas – Fort Smith's most productive authors include Emile Letournel, R Judet, Mohammad A. Halim, Bradley E. Wiggins, Surya M. Nauli, Md Nayeem Hossain, Muhammad Ali, Jim R. Wollscheid, Md Sajjadur Rahman and Madhav V. Rajan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact