Southwest Minnesota State University

29.7k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Southwest Minnesota State University

1.3k papers receiving 27.5k citations

Peers

Southwest Minnesota State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Applied Psychology 1.3k
  • Soil Science 2.4k
  • Social Psychology 5.0k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 2.0k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 244
Replace University of Minnesota Morris with:
University of Minnesota Morris United States
University of Nebraska at Kearney United States
Fort Hays State University United States
University of Wisconsin–Green Bay United States
University of Wisconsin–River Falls United States
University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point United States
Winona State University United States
University of Wisconsin–Stout United States
Truman State University United States
St. Catherine University United States
Southwest Minnesota State University relative to University of Minnesota Morris United States University of Minnesota Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
University of Minnesota Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Southwest Minnesota State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Southwest Minnesota State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Southwest Minnesota State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southwest Minnesota State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Southwest Minnesota State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Southwest Minnesota State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Southwest Minnesota State University at the time of their publication.

About Southwest Minnesota State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Southwest Minnesota State University have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 29.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Development, 6 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 92 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 29 papers in General Materials Science and 80 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Economic and Technological Developments in Russia (69 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (47 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (46 papers), Regional Economic Development and Innovation (44 papers), Legal and Policy Issues (39 papers), Surface Treatment and Coatings (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (30 papers) and Engineering Technology and Methodologies (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.3k citations), Soil Science (2.4k citations), Social Psychology (5.0k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (2.0k citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (244 citations). Authors at Southwest Minnesota State University collaborate with scholars in United States, Russia and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Agronomy Journal, Weed Technology, Crop Science, Journal of American History and Journal of Economic Entomology. Some of Southwest Minnesota State University's most productive authors include William Pavot, Ed Diener, Ed Diener, Alan J. Schlegel, Robert A. Ersek, Marshall Scott Poole, Andrew H. Van de Ven, Johnathon D. Holman, Mary Ann Stutts and Susan L. Kirby.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact