Whitney Museum of American Art

205.2k citations
6.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Whitney Museum of American Art

5.8k papers receiving 192.9k citations

Peers

Whitney Museum of American Art
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Paleontology 9.5k
  • Aerospace Engineering 21.6k
  • Molecular Biology 56.6k
  • Computational Mechanics 16.3k
  • Physiology 3.2k
Replace City College of New York with:
City College of New York United States
University of Rhode Island United States
University of New Hampshire United States
U.S. National Science Foundation United States
Brookhaven National Laboratory United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine United States
University of Massachusetts Boston United States
Carnegie Institution for Science United States
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique Canada
University of Maine United States
Whitney Museum of American Art relative to City College of New York United States City College of New York's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
City College of New York · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Whitney Museum of American Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Whitney Museum of American Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Whitney Museum of American Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Whitney Museum of American Art more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Whitney Museum of American Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Whitney Museum of American Art at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Whitney Museum of American Art at the time of their publication.

About Whitney Museum of American Art

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Whitney Museum of American Art have published 6.4k papers, which have received a total of 205.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 298 papers in Paleontology, 827 papers in Computational Mechanics, 207 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and 1.0k papers in Mechanical Engineering on the topics of Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization (541 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (328 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (314 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (271 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (243 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (238 papers), Heat Transfer Mechanisms (210 papers) and Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (204 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (9.5k citations), Aerospace Engineering (21.6k citations), Molecular Biology (56.6k citations), Computational Mechanics (16.3k citations) and Physiology (3.2k citations). Authors at Whitney Museum of American Art collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Turbomachinery, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Molecular Biology and Journal of Experimental Biology. Some of Whitney Museum of American Art's most productive authors include Frank J. Slack, Aurora Esquela‐Kerscher, Mark Gerstein, Louise Chawla, Mark Hochstrasser, Robin A. Wallace, Thomas A. Steitz, Andrew D. Miranker, Leonid L. Moroz and Barry W. Ache.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact