City College of New York

706.8k citations
20.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

City College of New York

18.6k papers receiving 661.1k citations

Peers

City College of New York
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Ecological Modeling 21.1k
  • Neurology 21.3k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 45.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 69.5k
Replace City University of New York with:
City University of New York United States
The Graduate Center, CUNY United States
State University of New York United States
Dartmouth College United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
University of Delaware United States
Stony Brook University United States
Syracuse University United States
Northeastern University United States
Queen's University Canada
City College of New York relative to City University of New York United States City University of New York's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
City University of New York · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at City College of New York

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at City College of New York. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at City College of New York with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites City College of New York more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at City College of New York

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with City College of New York at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with City College of New York at the time of their publication.

About City College of New York

In recent decades, authors affiliated with City College of New York have published 20.7k papers, which have received a total of 706.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 105 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 2.5k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 470 papers in Neurology, 341 papers in Biophysics and 494 papers in Geometry and Topology on the topics of Quantum and electron transport phenomena (372 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (364 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (361 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (344 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (326 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (298 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (271 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (269 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (21.1k citations), Neurology (21.3k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (45.6k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (69.5k citations). Authors at City College of New York collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Optics Letters. Some of City College of New York's most productive authors include Teresa J. Bandosz, Robert P. Anderson, Robert E. Schapire, Steven J. Phillips, R. R. Alfano, Sheldon Weinbaum, Goran Senjanović, Rabindra N. Mohapatra, Stephen C. Cowin and John R. Lombardi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact