World Heart Federation

10.5k citations
240 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

World Heart Federation

188 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers

World Heart Federation
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Family Practice 303
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 494
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 145
Replace Italian Institute of Telemedicine with:
Italian Institute of Telemedicine Italy
Domus Medica Belgium
Dutch College of General Practitioners Netherlands
Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol Austria
European CanCer Organisation Belgium
Novartis (Spain) Spain
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration United Kingdom
Health Foundation United Kingdom
British Lung Foundation United Kingdom
EuroQol Research Foundation Netherlands
World Heart Federation relative to Italian Institute of Telemedicine Italy Italian Institute of Telemedicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Italian Institute of Telemedicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at World Heart Federation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at World Heart Federation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at World Heart Federation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Heart Federation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at World Heart Federation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with World Heart Federation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with World Heart Federation at the time of their publication.

About World Heart Federation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with World Heart Federation have published 240 papers, which have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 58 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 7 papers in Family Practice, 67 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 50 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 21 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (58 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (24 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (23 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (16 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (15 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (15 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (303 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (494 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (145 citations). Authors at World Heart Federation collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Global Heart, European Heart Journal, The Lancet, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Circulation. Some of World Heart Federation's most productive authors include Kathryn A. Taubert, K. Srinath Reddy, Sidney C. Smith, Pablo Perel, David John Hunter, Daniel W. Jones, Lori J. Mosca, Harlan M. Krumholz, Thomas A. Pearson and Jerilyn K. Allen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact