United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Policy Implementation Science
Papers in
- Pharmacy 42
- Obesity and Health Practices 42
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 31
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 22
- Top scholars
- Martin WhiteFalko F. SniehottaStephan U DombrowskiDominika KwaśnickaAmelia A. LakeClare BambraJohn HughesSophie Staniszewska
- Journals
- BMJ Open (17 papers)BMC Public Health (14 papers)Journal of Public Health (12 papers)PLoS ONE (11 papers)Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
236 papers receiving 10.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- General Health Professions 3.8k
- Health 895
- Pharmacy 506
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.8k
Countries citing scholars working at United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration at the time of their publication.
About United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration have published 247 papers, which have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 42 papers in Pharmacy, 109 papers in General Health Professions, 36 papers in Health, 103 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 17 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (76 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (42 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (34 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (31 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (22 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (21 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (18 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (3.8k citations), Health (895 citations), Pharmacy (506 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.8k citations). Authors at United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Australia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ Open, BMC Public Health, Journal of Public Health, PLoS ONE and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. Some of United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration's most productive authors include Martin White, Falko F. Sniehotta, Stephan U Dombrowski, Dominika Kwaśnicka, Amelia A. Lake, Clare Bambra, John Hughes, Sophie Staniszewska, Carole Mockford and Jo Brett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.