Carnegie Mellon University

5.1M citations
104.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Carnegie Mellon University

95.4k papers receiving 4.9M citations

Peers

Carnegie Mellon University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • General Decision Sciences 49.1k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 534.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 834.4k
  • Hardware and Architecture 157.3k
  • Software 83.1k
Replace University of Maryland, College Park with:
University of Maryland, College Park United States
Princeton University United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
Pennsylvania State University United States
Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
University of Waterloo Canada
New York University United States
Columbia University United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
Carnegie Mellon University relative to University of Maryland, College Park United States University of Maryland, College Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
University of Maryland, College Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Carnegie Mellon University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Carnegie Mellon University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Carnegie Mellon University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carnegie Mellon University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Carnegie Mellon University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University at the time of their publication.

About Carnegie Mellon University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University have published 104.6k papers, which have received a total of 5.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.2k papers in Hardware and Architecture, 20.2k papers in Artificial Intelligence, 10.5k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2.0k papers in Software and 2.6k papers in Human-Computer Interaction on the topics of Topic Modeling (2.6k papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2.6k papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2.4k papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (1.9k papers), Formal Methods in Verification (1.9k papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (1.9k papers), Software Engineering Research (1.9k papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (49.1k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (534.4k citations), Artificial Intelligence (834.4k citations), Hardware and Architecture (157.3k citations) and Software (83.1k citations). Authors at Carnegie Mellon University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Environmental Science & Technology and Macromolecules. Some of Carnegie Mellon University's most productive authors include Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, John A. Pople, Sheldon Cohen, Herbert A. Simon, John R. Anderson, George Loewenstein, Takeo Kanade, Wesley M. Cohen, Ignacio E. Grossmann and Sebastian Thrun.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact