United States Military Academy

641.4k citations
13.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Military Academy

12.7k papers receiving 591.7k citations

Peers

United States Military Academy
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Virology 34.6k
  • Infectious Diseases 57.5k
  • Molecular Biology 183.8k
  • Pharmacology 19.7k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 14.0k
Replace Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) with:
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) United States
Pfizer (United States) United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai United States
Northeastern University United States
DuPont (United States) United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute United States
Triangle United States
Wake Forest University United States
Université de Sherbrooke Canada
United States Military Academy relative to Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) United States Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Military Academy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Military Academy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Military Academy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Military Academy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Military Academy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Military Academy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Military Academy at the time of their publication.

About United States Military Academy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Military Academy have published 13.9k papers, which have received a total of 641.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 471 papers in Virology, 165 papers in Architecture, 335 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 942 papers in Infectious Diseases and 3.4k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (462 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (453 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (438 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (390 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (345 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (341 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (290 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (286 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Virology (34.6k citations), Infectious Diseases (57.5k citations), Molecular Biology (183.8k citations), Pharmacology (19.7k citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (14.0k citations). Authors at United States Military Academy collaborate with scholars in United States, Puerto Rico and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Vaccine. Some of United States Military Academy's most productive authors include Gideon A. Rodan, Jiunn Huei Lin, Bogdan K. Matuszewski, M. R. Hilleman, W. Wayt Gibbs, Marvin L. Constanzer, C.M. Chavez-Eng, Edwin A. Risley, George W. Nuss and C. A. Winter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact