United States Food and Drug Administration

1.5M citations
39.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Food and Drug Administration

38.7k papers receiving 1.5M citations

Peers

United States Food and Drug Administration
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Endocrinology 27.4k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 35.9k
  • Immunology 87.9k
  • Toxicology 23.9k
  • Pharmacology 42.7k
Replace Johns Hopkins Medicine with:
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
Duke Medical Center United States
National Cancer Institute United States
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai United States
Michigan Medicine United States
Pfizer (United States) United States
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention United States
United States Food and Drug Administration relative to Johns Hopkins Medicine United States Johns Hopkins Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Johns Hopkins Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Food and Drug Administration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Food and Drug Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Food and Drug Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Food and Drug Administration more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Food and Drug Administration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Food and Drug Administration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Food and Drug Administration at the time of their publication.

About United States Food and Drug Administration

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Food and Drug Administration have published 39.9k papers, which have received a total of 1.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Toxicology, 2.3k papers in Analytical Chemistry, 841 papers in Endocrinology, 3.8k papers in Food Science and 1.7k papers in Pharmacology on the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1.7k papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1.5k papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1.2k papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1.1k papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (1.1k papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (1.1k papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (1k papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (844 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology (27.4k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (35.9k citations), Immunology (87.9k citations), Toxicology (23.9k citations) and Pharmacology (42.7k citations). Authors at United States Food and Drug Administration collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of AOAC International, Journal of Food Protection, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and PLoS ONE. Some of United States Food and Drug Administration's most productive authors include Richard Pazdur, Carl E. Cerniglia, Dennis M. Klinman, Helen L Reynolds, William Horwitz, Vinod P. Shah, Janet Woodcock, Richard W. Pastor, Raj K. Puri and Abdu I. Alayash.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact