Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

9.4k citations
436 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

371 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers

Roosevelt Institute for American Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 591
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 592
  • Education 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 426
  • Epidemiology 964
Replace Wokingham Hospital with:
Wokingham Hospital United Kingdom
French Community of Belgium Belgium
Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen Belgium
British Council United Kingdom
Men's Health Forum United Kingdom
Association for Language Learning United Kingdom
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) Netherlands
Fondation de France France
Action for ME United Kingdom
Leonard Cheshire United Kingdom
Roosevelt Institute for American Studies relative to Wokingham Hospital United Kingdom Wokingham Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Wokingham Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Roosevelt Institute for American Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Roosevelt Institute for American Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roosevelt Institute for American Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Roosevelt Institute for American Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Roosevelt Institute for American Studies at the time of their publication.

About Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Roosevelt Institute for American Studies have published 436 papers, which have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 24 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 54 papers in Epidemiology and 1 paper in Chemical Health and Safety on the topics of Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (17 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (17 papers), Gut microbiota and health (14 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (12 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (11 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (591 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (592 citations), Education (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (426 citations) and Epidemiology (964 citations). Authors at Roosevelt Institute for American Studies collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Dose-Response, Computational Geometry, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, PLoS ONE and Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics. Some of Roosevelt Institute for American Studies's most productive authors include Ger T. Rijkers, Sofie M. M. Loyens, D. Meyer, Bryan Tungland, Remy M. J. P. Rikers, Lisette Wijnia, Giles Scott‐Smith, Jaap C. Hanekamp, Herman Lelieveldt and Tamara van Gog.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact