Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

37.7k citations
4.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

3.3k papers receiving 35.1k citations

Peers

Autonomous University of Tamaulipas
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Parasitology 2.1k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 3.2k
  • Insect Science 2.8k
  • Small Animals 1.4k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.6k
Replace Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala with:
Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala Mexico
Texas A&M University – Kingsville United States
Autonomous University of Queretaro Mexico
Universidad Veracruzana Mexico
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Mexico
Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación Mexico
Tecnológico Nacional de México Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa Mexico
Universidad de Colima Mexico
Autonomous University of Tamaulipas relative to Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala Mexico Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Autonomous University of Tamaulipas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Autonomous University of Tamaulipas more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Autonomous University of Tamaulipas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Autonomous University of Tamaulipas at the time of their publication.

About Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Autonomous University of Tamaulipas have published 4.1k papers, which have received a total of 37.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 345 papers in Insect Science, 210 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 77 papers in Forestry, 356 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 145 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (192 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (150 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (142 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (142 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (125 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (110 papers), Plant and animal studies (109 papers) and Plant and soil sciences (108 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Parasitology (2.1k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (3.2k citations), Insect Science (2.8k citations), Small Animals (1.4k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (1.6k citations). Authors at Autonomous University of Tamaulipas collaborate with scholars in Mexico, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Animals, Zootaxa, Journal of Applied Animal Research, Applied Sciences and CyTA - Journal of Food. Some of Autonomous University of Tamaulipas's most productive authors include José A. Ramı́rez, Manuel Vázquez, Gonzalo Velázquez, Simón Pedro Ízcara Palacios, Marco A. Panduro, Julio Martı́nez-Burnes, Daniel Mota‐Rojas, Consuelo Almazán, José de la Fuente and Joseph Varón.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact