University of the Arts

59.4k citations
1000 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of the Arts

787 papers receiving 55.9k citations

Peers

University of the Arts
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Strategy and Management 27.3k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 6.9k
  • Business and International Management 1.7k
  • Accounting 9.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 7.0k
Replace Stratford University with:
Stratford University United States
New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations United States
Office of International Affairs United States
Bryant University United States
William P. Wharton Trust United States
McKinsey & Company (United States) United States
Economic Policy Institute United States
Mitchell College United States
Morgan Stanley (United States) United States
American Enterprise Institute United States
University of the Arts relative to Stratford University United States Stratford University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Stratford University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of the Arts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of the Arts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of the Arts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of the Arts more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of the Arts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of the Arts at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of the Arts at the time of their publication.

About University of the Arts

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of the Arts have published 1000 papers, which have received a total of 59.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 37 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 48 papers in Statistics and Probability, 87 papers in Strategy and Management, 66 papers in Accounting and 17 papers in Music on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (48 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (41 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (33 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (22 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (21 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (20 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (18 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Strategy and Management (27.3k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (6.9k citations), Business and International Management (1.7k citations), Accounting (9.2k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (7.0k citations). Authors at University of the Arts collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Business Ethics, Statistics in Medicine, Nature Communications and Biometrics. Some of University of the Arts's most productive authors include Sidney G. Winter, Daniel A. Levinthal, Bruce Kogut, James G. March, Raphael Amit, Christoph Zott, Harbir Singh, Jean‐François Hennart, Lori Rosenkopf and Balaji S. Chakravarthy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact